When Knowledge Becomes Redundant: How UK Universities Are Being Left to Sink

I became an academic because I believed in universities as places where society invests in knowledge, curiosity, and creativity. Places where education is not a commodity but a public good. But over the past decade, the UK university sector has been reshaped into something far bleaker: a corporate-managed machine in slow decline, overseen by governments that wash their hands of responsibility.

The neglect is deliberate. Successive governments have reduced investment in higher education while insisting that universities must regulate themselves, cope with the financial aftershocks of Brexit, survive on frozen tuition fees, and compete in an increasingly hostile market. They sit quietly as institutions flounder, watching decades of built-up talent and expertise go to waste in the name of “efficiency.”

Meanwhile, the narrative of crisis is weaponised against staff. Teaching and research are reduced to line items on a spreadsheet. Those of us once celebrated as contributors to knowledge are now liabilities to be managed. The dreaded word redundancy stalks our corridors — and with it, the sense that education itself is seen as expendable in today’s neoliberal order.

This is not simply about jobs. When a scientist, historian, or artist is declared redundant, so too is the work of science, history, and art. Research that could take years to bear fruit is cut off because it doesn’t promise immediate financial gain. Teaching, the very core of the university, is eroded by ballooning workloads, larger classes, and performance metrics that punish rather than support.

The government’s quietism makes the situation worse. It is one thing for universities to face market pressures; it is another for a government to stand by, framing the sector as if it were an indulgence rather than a national resource. The message is clear: higher education is on its own. Yet the human cost is profound — the wasting of brilliant minds, the stifling of curiosity, and the transformation of universities into precarious workplaces rather than intellectual communities.

This isn’t just an academic complaint. Universities are part of the cultural and scientific infrastructure of the UK. To allow them to wither is to impoverish society as a whole. If we reduce them to businesses chasing financial survival, we shouldn’t be surprised when they fail to produce the discoveries, critical insights, and creative works that once made the UK’s universities admired worldwide.

The tragedy is that the erosion of higher education is happening not with a bang but with a shrug. Redundancy notices quietly delivered. Funding quietly withdrawn. A government quietly indifferent. But silence is complicity. To treat education and knowledge as redundant is to declare that our future is redundant too.

And the losses will not stop at the gates of the university. As public investment shrinks and universities are left to fend for themselves, the gaps in access to higher education will only widen. Those with privilege will still find their way in, while others are locked out. The result will be a narrower, less diverse intellectual life — one that reflects only the voices of those who can afford to be heard.

When universities are allowed to wither, society as a whole loses. We lose not just research breakthroughs and cultural achievements, but also the possibility of higher education as a ladder of opportunity, as a common good that benefits everyone. If we accept the slow strangling of our universities, we accept a future that is poorer, meaner, and smaller than it needs to be.

Photo license: CC BY 2.0